Vision IQ

Dunning-Kruger Effect Explanation: The Dunning-Kruger Effect manifests when individuals possessing limited proficiency in a particular field overestimate their competence. Essentially, they lack the awareness to measure their skills accurately. The Story of the Dunning-Kruger Effect: In the curious annals of human behaviour, there exists a chapter that is best described as "The Curious Case of McArthur Wheeler." McArthur, you see, believed in the power of invisibility. His chosen instrument for this fantastical transformation was not a wizard's cloak or a superpower but something you might find in your kitchen – lemon juice. Yes, you read that right, lemon juice. McArthur had a cunning plan. He figured that since lemon juice could be used as invisible ink, it would render him invisible to surveillance cameras. Armed with this slightly baffling belief, he embarked on a mission. And what was that mission, you ask? Not one, but two bank robberies. As you might have guessed,

Self-Serving Bias Explanation: Self-serving bias is a cognitive bias that involves individuals attributing positive events and successes to their character, abilities, or efforts while attributing negative events or failures to external factors beyond their control. In simpler terms, people tend to take credit for their successes but deflect blame for their failures. Example:   Imagine a teacher whose students perform exceptionally well on an exam. The teacher might attribute this success to his outstanding teaching skills, taking credit for it. However, if the same teacher's students perform poorly on another exam, he may shift the blame to factors like a challenging curriculum or unmotivated students, absolving themselves of responsibility. The Lance Armstrong Saga: A Pedaling Paradox Imagine a world-famous cyclist renowned for conquering the gruelling Tour de France not once but seven times. That was Lance Armstrong, a name synonymous with excellence on two wheels. Yet, lurking

Negativity Bias Explanation: Negativity bias is a cognitive tendency where we place greater importance on negative information or experiences than positive ones. This means we tend to remember and focus more on negative events or feedback, even when positive aspects are present. Example: Consider a teacher who devotes a disproportionate amount of time dwelling on a single student's disruptive behaviour in the classroom while neglecting to appreciate the positive contributions of the rest of the students. Fukushima Nuclear Disaster (2011) The Fukushima nuclear disaster was a major event with extensive negative consequences. However, in this context, the Negativity Bias relates to how it influenced global perceptions of nuclear energy. The media's extensive and often sensationalised coverage of the Fukushima disaster contributed to an amplified perception of nuclear power's dangers. While it's essential to cover such events thoroughly, this intense focus on the negative a

  Fundamental Attribution Error Explanation: The Fundamental Attribution Error (FAE), also known as the correspondence bias, refers to a cognitive bias in human psychology. It involves our tendency to attribute the behaviours of others to their internal characteristics, such as personality traits or dispositions, while underestimating the influence of external situational factors. In other words, when we observe someone's actions, we often overemphasize the role of their inherent qualities and underestimate the significance of the surrounding context in explaining why they acted the way they did. Example: If a student arrives late to class, we can readily explain their delay as being due to traffic, a situational factor beyond their control (external attribution). However, when another student is late, we might jump to the conclusion that they are lazy or lack punctuality as a character trait (internal attribution). Let us see another example,  if a student rarely participates in d

In-Group Bias Explanation: In-group bias is a psychological inclination where individuals tend to show favouritism towards their social group over others. It's a cognitive bias that occurs when we unconsciously prioritise people who belong to the same group as us, whether due to shared interests, backgrounds, or affiliations. Example: This bias can manifest when teachers unconsciously favour colleagues they have known (the "in-group") for a long time, possibly because they share teaching philosophies or have built a history of collaboration. This favouritism can inadvertently lead to challenges in working effectively with newer staff members (the "out-group") who may feel excluded or less valued. The Ford Pinto Case: The Ford Pinto is a well-known example of in-group bias in a management context. In the 1970s, Ford Motor Company introduced the Pinto, a compact car designed to compete with foreign imports. However, during the development of the Pinto, engineers d

  Halo Effect Explanation: The halo effect is a cognitive bias where we let one outstanding positive trait or characteristic of an individual unduly influence our overall judgment of them. In essence, we allow a "halo" of positivity to radiate from this single trait, overshadowing other aspects of their personality or abilities. Example: Imagine a student who possesses a charismatic and charming personality. Because of this charisma, teachers may subconsciously view this student more favourably. This positive perception might extend to their academic performance, even if their actual achievements or abilities in the subject matter don't align with this positive aura. Thomas Jefferson’s Example: Thomas Jefferson, the renowned Founding Father of the United States, embodies the Halo Effect. His legacy is undeniably impressive, as he played a pivotal role in drafting the Declaration of Independence, serving as the third President of the United States, and championing individu

  Anchoring Bias Explanation: Anchoring bias is a cognitive tendency that influences our decision-making process. It occurs when we give excessive importance to the initial information we come across when making judgments or choices. Essentially, this initial information becomes a mental "anchor" that influences subsequent decisions, often overshadowing other relevant information. Example: Consider a parent-teacher conference to illustrate this bias in an educational context. Suppose a teacher, during the conference, first hears about a student's challenging behaviour, such as disciplinary issues or classroom disruptions. This initial negative information becomes the anchor. Even if there are positive aspects to that student's performance, the teacher may unintentionally fixate on the negative behaviour and form an overall negative perception of the student. This bias could lead to underestimating the student's potential or not fully recognising their strengths. E