Cognitive Biases and Their Impact - 8 (Self-Serving Bias)
Self-Serving Bias
Self-serving bias is a cognitive bias that involves individuals attributing positive events and successes to their character, abilities, or efforts while attributing negative events or failures to external factors beyond their control. In simpler terms, people tend to take credit for their successes but deflect blame for their failures.
Example:
Imagine a teacher whose students perform exceptionally well on an exam. The teacher might attribute this success to his outstanding teaching skills, taking credit for it. However, if the same teacher's students perform poorly on another exam, he may shift the blame to factors like a challenging curriculum or unmotivated students, absolving themselves of responsibility.
The Lance Armstrong Saga: A Pedaling Paradox
Imagine a world-famous cyclist renowned for conquering the gruelling Tour de France not once but seven times. That was Lance Armstrong, a name synonymous with excellence on two wheels. Yet, lurking beneath the fame and glory were persistent whispers of doping, accusations that Armstrong vehemently dismissed. His mantra: "I'm clean, it's all me."
Picture Armstrong zipping up treacherous mountain slopes, overtaking his competitors with apparent ease, all while swearing that his success was purely the result of grit, determination, and natural talent. He was quick to pin the blame on a massive conspiracy against him, an elaborate plot to tarnish his legacy.
In this compelling case, Armstrong's self-serving bias was his shield. It allowed him to cling to his status as a sports legend, deflecting any accusations and criticism like a pro. For years, he stuck to his story, even as the evidence mounted. Only when the walls closed in did he finally confess to doping. The self-serving bias, the very force that propped up his denial, crumbled under the weight of truth.
The Bold But Ill-Fated General Custer: Little Bighorn's Daring Descent
Now, picture a maverick military general, George Armstrong Custer, a name etched in American lore. Known for his fearless leadership, Custer led his troops through numerous battles, earning a reputation for audacity.
Custer's defining moment came at the Battle of Little Bighorn. He faced off against Native American forces under Sitting Bull, convinced that victory was all but assured. Ignoring intelligence that suggested he was vastly outnumbered, Custer's self-serving bias ran rampant. He saw himself as an indomitable warrior who could single-handedly conquer the plains.
Yet, it was this very self-serving bias that led to his undoing. Custer's overconfidence translated into a reckless decision: splitting his troops and charging headlong into battle without waiting for reinforcements. The result? It was a staggering defeat, Custer's own demise, and a sombre chapter in American history.
In these riveting tales, we see the self-serving bias in full force. Lance Armstrong wielded it to fend off doping allegations until the truth inevitably caught up with him. General Custer's self-serving bias manifested as overconfidence and proved to be his downfall at Little Bighorn. These stories, one from the world of sports and the other from military history are captivating examples of how self-serving bias can propel narratives in surprising and impactful ways.
Impact:
This bias can adversely affect team dynamics within an educational setting. When individuals habitually take credit for successes while deflecting blame for failures, it can hinder collaborative efforts. This behaviour can create a divisive atmosphere where cooperation and shared responsibility become challenging, potentially impeding the overall effectiveness of teaching and learning initiatives.
Comments